This excellent Bob Burnett editorial doesn't even mention Representative John Murtha (D-PA), but CSPAN carried Murtha's speech from the House floor, in which Rep. Murtha rattled off a list of the appropriations - billions of dollars - the Democrats had ADDED to the Bush-Republican war-budget request.
We had received an anti-war e-mail or op-ed (by Dave Sirota among others)decrying the INCREASED Dem. outlay for war spending OVER the Bush-Republican-administration requests as proof of the Democrat's HAWKISH, neo-con and AIPAC tendencies. But as Mr. Murtha explained forcefully to the (near empty) House chamber and CSPAN viewers, many of the budgetary increases were for NON-FIGHTING expenditures - foremost among them VETERANS CARE.
Among the active military budget increases, Murtha explained that many were to insist that US troops committed to the Iraq hellhole be ADEQUATELY TRAINED and PREPARED... BEFORE they got there! There were other provisions to bolster the size of the US military NOT deployed in Iraq (by 50,000 active duty?). But Mr. Murtha made forcefully clear - the increase in troop numbers were NOT a carte-blanche for Mr. Bush to send MORE and MORE and MORE troops to Iraq - on the contrary, the Bush admin. and Department of Defense had to CERTIFY that troops were fully trained and equipped BEFORE deployment; AND the Bush White House had to demonstrate SOME MEASURE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT - 'benchmarks' - BEFORE wholesale committing fresh waves of troops.
We salute Mr. Murtha for his forceful, impassioned leadership, and for assisting Speaker Pelosi in the "hearding cats" effort to get anti-war Democrats to sign on to the bill. We won't go into Mr. Murtha falling for the administration's lies-to-war rational in late 2002 and the spring of 2003; indeed, there are STILL millions of Americans who take at face value the Bush administration's conflicting, often duplicitous rationals for war.
BUT the Pelosi Congress has FINALLY put real limits on the UNLIMITED, SPLURGE ALL YOU WANT 'leadership' of the Rove-Bush-Cheney White House, and hopefully the Democrats will more forcefully DEMAND that the press/media more accurately report on both the war and the failed Bush administration leadership from this point on.
-------------------------------------------------
Pelosi's Triumph
Bob Burnett
03.24.2007
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-burnett/pelosis-triumph_b_44145.html
Friday's vote against the war in Iraq was a double triumph: A landmark vote to put an end to the mad policies of George Bush and an unusually unified stand by a Democratic Party often distinguished by its disunity. The leader who brought Democrats together was Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
H.R. 1591, The US Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health and Iraq Accountability Act, calls upon President Bush to use common sense in his management of the Iraq conflict. The contents of H.R. 1591 have been largely overlooked in the debate about the philosophical issues behind the bill: whether or not it is the roll of Congress to exercise oversight of the President in his role as commander-in-chief. Republicans say no: any attempt to reign in Bush's policies in Iraq amounts to "micro-managing" the conduct of the war. Democrats say yes: Congress has the constitutional duty to check the war powers of the President; particularly when that President is George Bush, someone whose judgment has proved to be consistently off the mark.
The contents of H.R. 1591 reflect the will of the American people, who have soured on this war and Bush's leadership. Americans want our troops to be fully funded, but don't want the duration of the war to be open ended: a point Bush steadfastly ignores.
The March 6th Gallup Poll results mirror the intent of H.R. 1591. Fifty-nine percent of respondents oppose Bush's "surge" plan: his addition of 21,500 troops to those already in Iraq. Fifty-seven percent support setting a cap on the number of troops in Iraq. Sixty percent support establishing a "timetable" so that troops are withdrawn "by the end of next year." Seventy-seven percent support "requiring U.S. troops to come home from Iraq if Iraq's leaders fail to meet promises to reduce violence there." However, sixty-one percent of Gallup Poll respondents oppose "Denying the funding needed to send any additional U.S. troops to Iraq." In other words, Americans don't want more troops sent to Iraq, believe there needs to be a plan to bring them home, but want to fully fund them while they are there: they want the contents of H.R. 1591.
Given the fact that H.R. 1591 so closely follows the reasoning of the American people, the wonder is that it did not pass by more than a six-vote margin (218-212). To be noted is the fact that all but two Republicans voted against it: yet another indication that when it comes to national security, Republicans are lemmings, totally willing to let mad George lead the United States off a cliff.
What's equally amazing is the fact that all but fourteen Democrats voted for H.R. 1591. Republicans may be lemmings, easily led in a destructive direction, but all too often Dems have been cats: unwilling, as a group, to be led in any direction. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi managed to unite all facets of Congressional Democrats: Conservatives--so called "blue dogs", Centrists, and Progressives. That's the real triumph in this vote: Democrats united against this war. Joined together to express the will of the American people. And, to stand for a clear alternative to Bush's "stay until we win" philosophy.
It's worth remembering that there were those who felt Pelosi was an unlikely choice to unify House Democrats. Critics argued that Dems needed someone more like burly Republican Dennis Hastert, a former wrestling coach, or the Machiavellian Newt Gingrich to whip them into shape. But it was petite, feminine Nancy Pelosi who became the first woman chosen as Speaker of the House of Representatives. And Pelosi--an outspoken opponent of this war from the onset; one of the few Democrats who voted against the Congressional authorization for the war; and the only member of the 2002 House Leadership who said Iraq was not an imminent danger to the United States--who secured the Democratic votes necessary to pass "The US Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health and Iraq Accountability Act." Nancy Pelosi, an unabashed liberal.
It was Speaker of the House Pelosi who managed to herd the Democratic Congressional cats and head them in a direction that reflects the will of the American people. Therefore, H.R. 1591 is Speaker Pelosi's triumph. A triumph that all progressives should savor. A liberal woman is providing the leadership required to extricate the United States from Iraq.
H.R. 1591 is a good first step towards ending the dreadful war in Iraq. It's an indication that Democrats have unified to oppose President Bush's ill-conceived and reckless plans. And an indication that Nancy Pelosi is a leader to be reckoned with.
